NEMO™ Highways
Built for highway and bridge packages

Every site record you already keep is claim evidence.

A highway package is measured by chainage, buried layer by layer, and paid against Schedule H. NEMO records it that way — so a daily report, an inspection or an NCR is already located, already dated, and already citable in a formal letter under your conditions of contract.

Request a demo See how it works
DSR daily site report WIR inspections & hold points NCR non-conformance Schedule H measurement IPC payment certificates FIDIC or bespoke conditions
Drag to rotate
Each stage is a work inspection request. A Fail or Pass with Comments holds the next stage until written clearance is on the record.
22
Modulesone platform, one login
1
Form lifecycleidentical in every module
4
Access tiersset per module, per person
6
Record typesthat auto-cite in a letter
Chainage

Every record is located by chainage.

Location is a first-class field on the daily site report, observations, inspections and RFIs — as a point (Ch. 42+300) or as a reach (Ch. 42+300 to 44+100). Filter any register by stretch of road and the whole history of that reach comes back at once.

DSR-0219 · reach Ch. 42+300 – 44+100
NCR-0015
DSR-0219
WIR-0042
RFI-0088
40+000
41+000
42+000
43+000
44+000
45+000

Point or reach

An observation is a point. A day's work is a reach. Both are recorded the way the work actually happened.

Assemble a claim by stretch

An EOT argued over a specific reach pulls every DSR, WIR, NCR and RFI that touched it — no manual archaeology.

Structures line up

Bridge elements are named to the drawing register convention, so records and drawings agree on what P-3 is.

Illustrative reach shown on an anonymised 4-lane package.

Hold points

Work stops until the inspection is cleared in writing.

Once a layer is covered by the next one, the evidence is physically gone. A work inspection request carries a checklist, a named inspector, a result and hold points — and if the result is Fail or Pass with Comments, work does not proceed until the PMC issues written clearance. The clearance is recorded, and the element is re-inspected.

01
WIR raisedActivity, element, location or chainage, checklist and requested inspection date.
02
PMC notifiedThe named inspector is on the record, not on a phone call.
03
Inspection conductedAgainst the checklist attached to the request, not from memory.
04
Result recordedPass, Pass with Comments, or Fail — with inspector remarks and any conditions attached to a pass.
05
Signed off, or heldA Fail or Pass with Comments blocks the covering activity until written clearance is recorded in Comments.
An NCR escalates from here. Activity, discipline, location, responsible contractor, spec reference — the contract clause, IS code or specification section that was not met — severity, root cause, corrective action, target close date, and a verification checklist. Closed only when the checklist is complete.
A work inspection request open in NEMO Highways: WIR-050, formwork inspection at CH 2+000 to 3+500, showing contractor, named inspector, result, and an inspection checklist with seven of eleven points done.
The request carries its own checklist. Discipline, chainage, contractor, named inspector, result — and every inspection point either ticked or left open, so a result is evidenced rather than asserted.
The comments thread on the same inspection: the contractor requests clearance, the PMC schedules it, records a bearing pocket 8mm high against the 5mm tolerance in IS 456 and instructs that the pour must not proceed, the client concurs, and the contractor reports the rectification with photographs.
And the hold point is argued on the record. A bearing pocket 8 mm high against a 5 mm tolerance, an instruction that the pour must not proceed without clearance, the client concurring, the rectification reported back — all against the WIR, not in somebody's inbox.
Why it exists

Claims are not lost in arbitration. They are lost on site, months earlier.

The evidence is scattered

The NCR is in one register, the inspection in another, the daily report in a site diary, the photographs on someone's phone.

The letter is written from memory

Someone retypes references, dates and severity into a Word template. One transposed reference and the reply challenges the notice itself.

The clock ran out quietly

A 28-day notice under FIDIC 20.2 is time-barred whether or not anyone was counting. Nothing on a spreadsheet turns red on day 27.

Correspondence & claims

Link the record. The letter writes its own citation.

Attach site records to a thread and the draft letter's {{CIRCUMSTANCES}} slot fills itself with a formal citation for each — correct reference, correct date, correct chainage, correct severity. Never typed by hand.

Linked records (evidence)
NCR-0015 · Non-Conformance Report
Pier P-3 cover block spacing
14 Aug 2026 · Ch. 42+300 · Severity: Major
WIR-0042 · Work Inspection Request
Pier P-3 reinforcement cage
12 Aug 2026 · Result: Fail
SOR-0031 · Site Observation
Delivery note for cement batch not available
09 Aug 2026 · Quality · Severity: Medium
Six record types cite themselves: Observation, NCR, WIR, RFI, Daily Site Report and Payment Certificate — each with its own citation sentence.
Notice to CorrectThread — one subject, one chain
4-lane package
Governing: FIDIC 15.1
Subject: Notice to Correct — Reinforcement Non-Conformance, Pier P-3

Dear Sir,

Reference is made to Non-Conformance Report NCR-0015 dated 14 August 2026, relating to Pier P-3 cover block spacing at Ch. 42+300 (Severity: Major). Reference is further made to Work Inspection Request WIR-0042 for Pier P-3 reinforcement cage, inspected on 12 August 2026 with result: Fail.

You are hereby instructed, under Sub-Clause 15.1 of the Conditions of Contract, to rectify the said non-conformance within [REASON — period and specific remedial works] of the date of this notice.

Yours faithfully,

Auto-filled from linked evidence. Manual slot — completed before issuing.

Drafted against your contract

Upload the signed conditions — a standard international form, a national or state authority's own document, an EPC agreement, or conditions drafted for this package alone — and every clause is extracted into a searchable Clause Library that feeds the clause chain in every thread.

Issue locks it

The draft becomes a dated PDF on your letterhead, is logged as Issued, can no longer be edited, and goes out through Transmittals with an acknowledgement record.

Deadline clocks

Your contract's clocks run whether you watch them or not.

NEMO computes the response deadline from the thread's awareness date and its governing clause, and turns it red when overdue. Periods come from the conditions you uploaded — a bespoke 21-day notice is tracked as faithfully as a standard 28-day one.

The Correspondence and Claims workspace in NEMO Highways. Counters across the top read time-barred, overdue, due within seven days, open threads and value at stake. A thread is open on the Clause Chain tab showing the deadline chain for a claim — notice of claim, engineer's initial response, fully detailed claim, consultation period, engineer determination and notice of dissatisfaction — each with the party obliged, the length of the window, the date it falls due, and what happens if it is missed.
The whole chain, not just the first notice. Each step carries the party it binds, the length of the window, the date it falls due — and the consequence of missing it, in the contract's own words: entitlement extinguished, notice of claim deemed valid, deemed determination rejecting the claim. The counters along the top are the ones that matter to a commercial manager: time-barred, overdue, due within seven days, and the value at stake.

Clause numbering and periods are read from the conditions on your own project — the chain above is one contract's; a bespoke form produces its own.

Digital stamping

Agreement recorded without a single scanned signature.

NDAs, labour rate schedules, Letters of Award and contract agreements are agreed inside the platform. Each party's registered stamp is embedded in the PDF — no printing, no scanning, no re-uploading.

PMC
Stamped

First party stamps

The PMC or Client reviews and applies their stamp. The document enters partial agreement; the other party is notified.

Fully
Stamped

Second party stamps

The Contractor opens the same document, already carrying the first stamp, and applies their own. Both impressions and timestamps are stored in the PDF.

Locked

Locked permanently

A fully stamped document can never be edited or replaced. A change means a new revision, stamped again from the start.

The NDA gate is enforced, not managed. A tenderer whose NDA is not fully stamped cannot reach the tender document package.
Tendering

Brief to Letter of Award, in one auditable trail.

01
BriefInternal scope, budget estimate, procurement strategy, evaluation basis. Contractors never see this tab.
02
EOICredentials against a configurable checklist; shortlist carries forward automatically.
03
Invite (NIT)Bid deadline, validity, EMD, pre-bid meeting, two-envelope submission checklist.
04
NDAParty-wise stamping. Tender documents stay locked until a bidder is fully stamped.
05
Float & ClarifyClarification register visible equally to all tenderers; numbered addenda with acknowledgement tracking.
06
Receive BidsEMD verification, envelope checklists, witnessed bid-opening record with names and quoted values.
07
Tender AnalysisComparative statement, weighted technical scoring, loading and normalisation ledger, QCBS ranking.
08
AwardLoA generated pre-filled, stamped by both parties, then creates the contract record with no re-entry.
The Tender Analysis tab of a tender in NEMO Highways, on Normalisation. Two tenderers are compared with their submitted sums, the adjustments applied to each, the corrected sum and the resulting rank. Panels alongside reconcile extra items one bidder priced and the others did not, and flag issued bill files a bidder left unpriced, loaded at the engineer's estimate.
Bids made comparable before they are ranked. Scope one bidder priced and another missed is deemed in, and an issued bill left blank is loaded at the engineer's estimate — here both tenderers had priced only 2% of the issued scope. Every adjustment is signed, attributed and visible, so the corrected sum can be defended line by line.

Every price adjustment is on the record

Arithmetic corrections, rate-anomaly loadings and conditional discount adjustments sit in a normalisation ledger, so each adjusted price is defensible line by line.

Award creates the contract

Once the LoA is fully stamped, one click creates the Contracts record — party, value, dates and contract number already filled in.

Every module

Everything a highway package has to be able to prove.

The Daily Site Report register in NEMO Highways: one row per date, each with shift, location by kilometre or chainage, weather, discipline, the activity carried out, progress, counts of labour, materials and machinery, and an approval status of draft, submitted or approved.
One row per day, already located and already dated. Km 11.2–13.0, pile boring at Pier P-08 — with the weather, the discipline, and that day's labour, materials and machinery counted against it. This is what a delay claim is built from eight months later, and the sidebar is the whole platform: site reporting, quality, resources, pre-award and commercial.
Site Reporting

Daily Site Report

One report per date — shift, chainage or reach, discipline, weather, activities. Pulls that day's labour, materials and machinery automatically by matching the date.
Location / ChainageShiftWeatherActivities

Observations

Site observations by category and severity, located precisely, escalating to non-conformance where required.
QualitySafetyEnvironmentalSeverity

Inspections (WIR)

Checklist, named inspector, result and hold points. Fail or Pass with Comments blocks the covering activity until written clearance.
ChecklistInspectorResultHold points

NCR

Auto-numbered, with the spec reference that was not met — contract clause, IS code or specification section — plus root cause, corrective action and a verification checklist.
Spec referenceSeverityRoot causeTarget close date

Method Statements

Revision-tracked methodology approved before an activity may start.

Submittals

Shop drawings, material approvals, mix design reports, catalogues and O&M manuals, each with a response clock.
Shop DrawingMaterial ApprovalMix DesignO&M Manual

RFI

Cross-referenced to the drawing it concerns and the chainage it relates to, with response-time tracking.
Project

Bridge Progress

Every structural element carries its own status and completion percentage, named to the drawing register convention.
PierAbutmentDeck SlabApproachesRetaining Wall

Project Team

Client, PMC, Contractor and Sub-contractor parties, with the approver list every submission draws from.
Resources

Labour

Morning muster by contractor and trade, split skilled and unskilled; an end-of-shift toggle confirms who completed the day. Rates come from the contract's stamped labour schedule.

Materials

Received, issued and returned against delivery-note references, with a running balance per category.

Machinery

Plant logged daily for working hours, idle hours and fuel. Utilisation is working ÷ (working + idle).
Commercial

Tendering

Brief through Award, with clarification register, normalisation ledger, weighted scoring and QCBS ranking.

Contracts

Contract information, payment terms, a 13-category attachment checklist, and the Clause Library extracted from the signed conditions.
Clause LibraryDigital stampingTamper-evident PDF

Workbook Register

Measurement books and abstracts recorded cumulatively to date, feeding the payment certificate.

Payment Certificates

Each IPC is the cumulative measure less what was already certified — the way an RA bill actually works.

DPR — Schedule HNew

Daily progress against the Schedule H road-works item structure, with composite item measurement feeding the same certification chain.
Quality

Mix Design StudioNew

Trial mixes by grade with cube results recorded and tracked to their test ages, linked to the mix design submittal that approved them.
Grades M15–M60Cube results

Material Tests

Acceptance testing against the specification — aggregate grading and impact value, soil CBR and field density, steel tensile, bitumen penetration — each result held against the lot it releases.
Lot / sourceSpec limitResultPass / fail

Batch Production

Concrete and bituminous batching logged at the plant — grade, quantity, target chainage and pour reference — so what was produced reconciles against what was placed and later measured.
PlantGradeQuantityPlaced at
Documents

Drawing Register

IFC, For Review, Superseded and Cancelled, with the superseding sheet named.

Transmittals

Every dispatch gets a numbered cover sheet and an acknowledgement date.
Correspondence

Correspondence & Claims

One running chain per subject, with the clause chain, the deadline clocks and letters drafted from linked evidence.
Overview

Dashboard

Read-only control room across eight tabs. Every figure is a live aggregate pulled from the source records — to change a number, update the record.
WIRNCR ageingSORRFIManpowerResourcesTAT
The spine

Learn one module and you have learned all of them.

Every module follows the same create, submit and approve pattern. Buttons, drawer, status badges and permissions behave identically everywhere, so a new site engineer is productive on day one.

01
+ NewReference number and date generated for you.
02
Save as DraftVisible only to your own team.
03
Submit to…Pick the approver from the project team; add CC recipients who need to know but need not act.
04
Approve · Revise · RejectLogged with name, timestamp and notes.
05
ClosedFiltered out of the active list, never deleted, always searchable.

Four access tiers

Project Admin — everything, including delete.
PMC Engineer — create, edit, submit and approve.
Contractor (Submit) — own records only, submit but never approve.
Viewer — read-only.

Set per module, not globally

The same person can be a PMC Engineer in Inspections and a Viewer in Contracts. Access follows responsibility, which is what an audit expects when it asks who could have approved what.

Get started

Bring one package. We will set it up with your team.

A live package, your Conditions of Contract, and one open claim is enough to see the difference — the clause library read from your own contract, and the first letter that cites its evidence without anyone retyping a reference.

Request a demo Talk on WhatsApp